How Video Games Inspire Great UX (2019)
AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Prime Big Deal Days · Oct 6–7Offer from Amazon

Get the latest gadgets delivered free — and shop member deals

  • Fast, free delivery on millions of items
  • Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
  • Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Start your free Prime trial Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Discussions about video games as a source of inspiration for user experience design circulated widely in design circles around 2019. The core ideas are long-established, but what specifically drove renewed attention is not confirmed.

Search interest and design-community discussion of video game design as a source of ideas for user experience (UX) work are spiking, with articles and talks from roughly 2019 resurfacing. The renewed attention is unconfirmed in origin; no specific announcement, publication, or event has been identified as its trigger. The underlying ideas — onboarding, feedback, motivation, and progressive difficulty — have appeared in game design and UX literature for years.

The claim at the center of this trend is straightforward: games routinely solve problems that mainstream software products struggle with. Well-designed games teach complex systems to players without manuals, through level design and contextual prompts. They provide immediate, legible feedback for every action, use progressive disclosure to introduce complexity gradually, and sustain motivation through goals, rewards, and visible progress. These are the same challenges product and UX teams face in onboarding flows, empty states, and retention design.

Specific practices often cited in this discussion include tutorial design (teaching by doing rather than by instruction), juice — the small animations, sounds, and visual responses that make interactions feel responsive — and difficulty curves adapted as progressive complexity in product design. Designers also point to how games communicate state and consequence clearly, so players always understand what their actions will do.

These parallels are not new. Game design literature, academic work on games, and UX practice have referenced one another for well over a decade, and the comparison predates the 2019-era articles by many years. What is current is the renewed circulation of this material in design communities and search interest around the topic, not a new discovery about games or UX.

At a glance
reportWhen: trend observation; original material da…
The developmentSearch and editorial interest in the connection between video game design and UX practice is spiking, with 2019-era writing on the topic resurfacing.
Top Steam deals right now
Persona 3 Reload-70%$17.99
Persona 5 Royal-70%$17.99
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – Complete Edition-50%$24.99
DARK SOULS™: REMASTERED-50%$19.99
DARK SOULS III Deluxe Edition-50%$42.49
DARK SOULS™ II: Scholar of the First Sin-50%$19.99
Dune: Awakening-50%$24.99
The Last of Us™ Part II Remastered-33%$33.49
Live · Steam store (current discounts)

Why Game Mechanics Matter to Product Teams

UX designers have drawn on game design for approaches to onboarding, progress indicators, and user engagement. These approaches include achievement and streak systems, progress indicators, and reward loops. Product teams may consider game design techniques when working on how software teaches users, presents progress, and supports continued use.

Designers have also raised concerns that some game mechanics, including rewards and variable reinforcement, can encourage manipulative product patterns. These concerns are part of ongoing discussion about dark patterns and ethical gamification.

The Long History of Games Feeding Interface Design

The exchange between games and interface design is long-standing. Direct-manipulation interfaces, visual feedback, and even hardware conventions like the mouse-and-cursor model were explored alongside early interactive and game systems. In the 2000s and 2010s, the rise of casual and mobile games brought game mechanics — points, badges, levels, leaderboards — into business and product vocabulary, commonly called gamification. By the late 2010s, when the articles now circulating were written, the argument had shifted from adding game trappings to products toward learning from the underlying craft of game design: clarity, pacing, feedback, and respect for the user’s learning curve.

What Is Driving the Spike Now

The immediate cause of the renewed interest is unconfirmed. Possible explanations include a recent talk, course, article, or social media thread gaining attention, or broader discussion of engagement and retention design in consumer products. No specific publication, event, or statement has been verified as the trigger. The available information consists of metadata indicating interest; it does not identify authors, events, or publications.

Where the Games-to-UX Conversation Goes

Further discussion may address how product teams apply game design approaches to onboarding and feedback, as well as concerns about their potential to encourage manipulative patterns. Confirmation that a specific talk, book, or article prompted the current attention would provide a concrete development to report.

Key Questions

Is the idea that video games inspire UX design new?

No. The connection between game design and interface design is long-established, discussed for well over a decade in both fields. What is current is renewed circulation of this material, not the idea itself.

What specific design practices do games contribute to UX?

Commonly cited practices include tutorial design that teaches by doing, immediate visual and audible feedback, progressive disclosure of complexity, difficulty curves adapted to product learning, and clear communication of state and consequence.

Is this the same as gamification?

Related but distinct. Gamification adds game elements like points and badges to products. The 2019-era argument goes further, suggesting designers learn from the underlying craft of game design rather than only borrowing surface mechanics.

Are there criticisms of borrowing from game design?

Yes. Some designers argue that reward loops and variable reinforcement borrowed from games can become manipulative, a concern discussed under the broader debate about dark patterns and ethical design.

Why is interest in this topic rising right now?

That is unclear. No specific announcement, publication, or event has been confirmed as the trigger, so the cause of the spike should be treated as unknown.

Source: hn

FALL

Fall Picks

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

IonQ Researchers Run MegaQuOp-Scale Quantum Error Decoder On A MacBook Pro

IonQ scientists successfully tested a large-scale quantum error decoder on a MacBook Pro, highlighting advances in quantum error correction accessible on standard hardware.

SpaceXAI’s New Grok 4.7 Improves On Coding, Maintains Cheaper Token Rates Than Peers – Seeking Alpha

SpaceXAI’s Grok 4.7 reportedly improves coding performance while keeping token costs below competitors, but details remain unconfirmed.

Guild Wars Surges In Global Coverage

Search interest and media coverage for Guild Wars have surged significantly, with 42 mentions in recent coverage—an increase of 12 times the baseline, sparking widespread attention.

Instead Of Convincing Us Digital-only Games Are Secretly A Good Thing, Sony Was Just Caught Testing Dynamic Pricing Again On PlayStation 5

Sony has been caught testing dynamic pricing on PlayStation 5, reigniting discussions on digital-only games and their perceived value.